This is the second post from Prof. Gregg Caruso re: an optimistic view of Free Will Skepticism.
[This two-part essay was inspired by the author’s TEDx talk on the same topic, which can be viewed here.] [1]
I. Addressing Pragmatic Concerns with Free Will Skepticism
Let me begin with the concern that giving up free will belief will increase anti-social behavior. This concern has been fueled largely by two widely reported on studies in social psychology (Vohs and Schooler 2008; Baumeister, Masicampo and DeWall 2009). Kathleen Vohs and Jonathan Schooler (2008) found, for example, that participants who were exposed to anti-free will primes were more likely to cheat than participants exposed to pro-free will or neutral primes. In one study, they asked thirty college students to solve math problems on a computer. The volunteers were told that owing to a computer glitch, the answers would pop up on the screen after the problem if they did not hit the space bar…
View original post 6,656 more words
Tienzen (Jeh-Tween) Gong
December 28, 2014
@Justin Caouette:
Thanks for bring me to your blog, and I bookmarked it.
I made five comments on this free-will issue at SS. If you have missed them, here is one of the comment (http://scientiasalon.wordpress.com/2014/12/23/free-will-skepticism-and-its-implications-an-argument-for-optimism-part-2/comment-page-2/#comment-10472 ) and am looking forward to your comment on them.
Tienzen (Jeh-Tween) Gong
LikeLike